What are common mistakes on Equity Public Offerings questions?
Watch out for these exam traps that candidates frequently miss on Equity Public Offerings questions:
Believing the SEC "approves" an offering when it only declares the registration effective
Confusing secondary offerings (existing shareholders selling) with follow-on offerings (new shares issued)
Thinking lock-up periods are SEC requirements when they are contractual with the underwriter
Forgetting that SPAC shareholders can redeem regardless of how they vote on the merger
What do Series 65 Equity Public Offerings questions look like?
A company completes its IPO and sells 10 million new shares to public investors. Who receives the proceeds from this offering?
B is correct. An IPO is a primary market transaction. The company is selling newly issued shares for the first time, so the proceeds flow to the issuing company itself (net of the underwriting spread).
A is incorrect because that describes a secondary offering, where existing shareholders sell their already-issued shares and receive the cash. C is incorrect: while the underwriter buys the shares from the issuer in a firm commitment (acting as principal), the economic proceeds still belong to the issuer. The underwriter earns the spread, not the offering proceeds. D is incorrect because the SEC plays a regulatory role only; it never receives offering proceeds.
"Who gets the money?" is one of the highest-frequency gotchas on the Series 65. The exam intentionally mixes primary (IPO / follow-on) offerings with secondary offerings to test whether you understand the cash flow. As an adviser, this matters when explaining to clients why a company "raising money" via a secondary offering is misleading shorthand: the company isn't receiving anything, the selling shareholders are cashing out.
An investor reading a registration statement sees that the SEC has declared the offering "effective." This means:
C is correct. "Effective" means the registration statement satisfies the disclosure requirements of the Securities Act of 1933. The SEC reviews for completeness of disclosure only. Once effective, the securities can be sold to the public.
A is incorrect and is the classic Series 65 trap: the SEC never approves an offering or passes judgment on investment merit. D is also incorrect for the same reason: the SEC never guarantees performance. B is incorrect because the SEC does not verify or audit the underlying financials; the issuer and its auditors are responsible for accuracy, and the SEC can pursue enforcement after the fact if misstatements are found.
Any answer choice claiming the SEC "approved," "endorsed," or "guaranteed" a security is almost always wrong on this exam. The SEC's role is disclosure-based regulation, not merit review. As an investment adviser representative, you have an obligation to correct clients who think a registered security carries an SEC seal of approval. The opposite is true: every prospectus must state that the SEC has not approved or disapproved the securities.
During the cooling-off period of an IPO, which of the following actions is PERMITTED?
B is correct. During the minimum 20-day cooling-off period, underwriters may distribute the preliminary prospectus (red herring) and publish tombstone ads to gauge investor interest. Indications of interest may be collected, but no sales may be made.
A is incorrect because no money may be accepted and no shares may be sold until the registration statement is effective. D is incorrect for the same reason: orders cannot be binding during the cooling-off period; they are only indications of interest. C is incorrect because participating underwriters are subject to quiet-period restrictions that prohibit publishing research recommendations on the offering.
The cooling-off period is heavily tested because it bundles several rules into one timeline. The mnemonic to remember: during cooling-off, you can show (red herring, tombstone) and ask (indications of interest), but you cannot sell (no orders, no money, no confirmations). Getting this distinction wrong is one of the most common Series 65 mistakes.
A managing underwriter purchases the entire issue from a company at a discount and resells it to the public, bearing the risk of any unsold shares. This is an example of:
B is correct. A firm commitment underwriting means the underwriter buys the entire issue from the issuer and is on the hook to resell it. The underwriter is acting as principal (dealer) because it actually takes ownership of the shares. If the offering fails, the underwriter is stuck with the shares.
A is incorrect because in a best efforts arrangement, the underwriter never buys the shares; it markets them as an agent (broker) on behalf of the issuer, returning any unsold shares. C is incorrect because all-or-none is a type of best efforts where the entire issue must sell or the deal is cancelled, and the underwriter still acts as agent. D is incorrect because mini-max is also a best-efforts variant (with a minimum sales threshold), and "broker" specifically means acting as agent, not principal.
The principal vs agent distinction is foundational to understanding how broker-dealers and underwriters earn money and bear risk. Series 65 questions on this topic test whether you can identify the role (principal = dealer = owns the shares; agent = broker = sells on behalf). This same framework reappears in principal transactions, suitability analyses, and disclosure rules for adviser conflicts of interest.
A tombstone advertisement for a new offering may legally include:
C is correct. A tombstone advertisement is a brief, factual public announcement of an offering. It may contain only basic identifying information: the issuer's name, the type of security being offered, the offering price (when set), and the names of the underwriters. It is NOT a prospectus and NOT an offer to sell.
A is incorrect because tombstone ads may not contain recommendations or promotional language. B is incorrect because forward-looking projections are prohibited; only factual present information may appear. D is incorrect for the obvious reason that the SEC does not approve offerings, so no advertisement may claim otherwise.
Tombstone ads sound informal but are tightly regulated. The exam tests this to make sure you understand that public-facing communications during a securities offering are restricted to prevent conditioning the market. As an adviser, recommending a security to a client based on a tombstone ad would be inappropriate; the client should rely on the prospectus, not promotional materials, when evaluating an offering.
Master Investment Vehicles: 25% of Your Exam
Investment products make up the largest section of the Series 65. CertFuel targets the specific distinctions between bonds, stocks, funds, and alternatives that appear most often.
Choose Your PathAn IPO is priced at $20 per share with an offering size of 10 million shares. The underwriter exercises the greenshoe option in full. What is the maximum number of additional shares the underwriter may sell?
C is correct. The greenshoe (overallotment) option allows the underwriter to sell up to 15% more shares than originally planned if demand is strong. 15% of 10 million shares is 1.5 million additional shares, so the maximum greenshoe allotment is 1,500,000 shares.
A (5%) and B (10%) are incorrect because they undercount the standard 15% greenshoe limit. D (20%) overstates it; while issuers may negotiate smaller greenshoes, the upper cap tested on the exam is 15%.
The greenshoe is one of the few specific numeric details that the Series 65 expects you to memorize for the public-offering process. The 15% cap and the name (after Green Shoe Manufacturing) are common single-line answer choices. As an adviser, recognizing that an offering size can grow by 15% post-pricing helps you explain to clients why "shares sold" on an IPO sometimes exceeds the initial filing's headline number.
Six months after a successful IPO, insiders of the company want to sell their pre-IPO shares but are told they cannot. The most likely reason is:
B is correct. Lock-up agreements are contractual arrangements between insiders (and other pre-IPO shareholders) and the underwriter. They typically last 90 to 180 days after the IPO and prevent insiders from flooding the market with shares immediately after going public. Six months still falls within a typical 180-day lock-up.
A is incorrect: Rule 144 governs restricted-securities resales but does not impose a blanket two-year IPO insider ban. C is incorrect because the SEC declares registration statements effective, not individual shareholders' resales. D is incorrect because the cooling-off period applies before, not after, an offering, and it lasts a minimum of 20 days (not one year).
A subtle but high-value exam point: lock-up periods are contractual, not regulatory. The SEC does not require them; underwriters do, to protect post-IPO price stability. As an adviser, this matters when discussing the post-IPO trading dynamics with clients: a lock-up expiration is often correlated with downward price pressure as insiders finally sell.
A publicly traded company plans to raise $200 million by issuing new shares. Which of the following statements is TRUE about this offering?
B is correct. When an already-public company issues new shares to raise capital, that is a follow-on offering (also called an additional primary offering or seasoned equity offering). New shares are created, so the total share count increases, diluting existing shareholders. The company itself receives the proceeds.
A and C are incorrect because "secondary offering" specifically means existing shareholders are selling their already-issued shares; no new shares are created and the company gets nothing. The exam intentionally exploits the confusion between "secondary" (meaning shareholders cashing out) and "second time" (meaning the company offers stock again). D is incorrect: companies can return to public markets many times via follow-on offerings.
This is one of the most exploited gotchas on Series 65 public-offering questions. Always anchor on who receives the proceeds: the issuer (follow-on / primary) or the selling shareholders (secondary). As an adviser, this distinction also matters for client communication around diversification and dilution risk: only follow-on offerings dilute existing shareholders.
An investor buys shares of a SPAC at the $10 IPO price. Two years later, the SPAC announces a proposed merger with a target company, but the investor does not want to participate in the merger. What option does the investor have?
C is correct. A defining feature of modern SPAC structure is that shareholders have redemption rights independent of their vote. Investors can redeem their shares for a pro rata share of the trust account (typically around $10 per share plus interest), regardless of whether they vote for, against, or abstain on the proposed merger.
A is incorrect because the redemption window opens around the merger vote, not 90 days after closing. B is incorrect because shareholders are never forced to participate; they always have the redemption right. D is the classic Series 65 SPAC trap: redemption is decoupled from voting. An investor can vote yes on the merger and still redeem their shares for cash.
SPACs have become a heavily tested topic because of their explosive growth in the early 2020s. The redemption-independent-of-vote rule is the single most counterintuitive fact about SPACs and the highest-probability exam point. For client suitability, this matters because it means SPACs offer a structural downside protection (you can always get your ~$10 back) that few other speculative investments provide.
Which of the following is the LARGEST source of dilution to public investors in a typical SPAC structure?
B is correct. SPAC sponsors typically receive 20% of post-IPO shares at little or no cost, known as the "promote." This is the single largest source of dilution to public investors, since 1/5th of the post-IPO equity goes to a small group of sponsors who paid almost nothing for it. The promote is a major reason SPAC academic studies show poor returns for IPO-stage investors versus sponsors.
A is incorrect because the greenshoe is a tool used in many IPOs, not unique to SPACs, and it expands the share count proportionally rather than at no-cost. C is incorrect because trust-account fees are typically small relative to the promote. D is incorrect because the SEC does not receive securities as part of any registration.
The 20% sponsor promote is the most-tested dilution number for SPACs. As an adviser, the promote also creates a structural conflict of interest: because the promote is only earned if a merger closes, sponsors have incentive to close ANY deal (even a bad one) rather than liquidate and earn nothing. Recognizing this conflict is central to the suitability analysis when recommending SPAC investments to clients.
What key terms appear in Equity Public Offerings questions?
Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC)
The primary federal regulator of securities markets, investment advisers, and securities offerings established by the Se...
Preferred Stock
A hybrid equity security that combines characteristics of both stocks and bonds. Pays fixed dividends (like bond interes...
Principal Transaction
A transaction in which an investment adviser trades securities with a client from the adviser's own account, acting as a...
Suitability
The obligation to recommend securities appropriate for a client's financial situation, investment objectives, risk toler...
Diversification
The practice of spreading investments across different securities, sectors, or asset classes to reduce unsystematic risk...