Tracking Error
Tracking Error
The standard deviation of the difference between a portfolio's returns and its benchmark's returns, measuring how consistently a fund follows (or deviates from) its benchmark. Low tracking error (1-2%) indicates passive management closely following the benchmark, while high tracking error (4-7%) indicates active management with significant deviations. Expressed as an annualized percentage.
An S&P 500 index fund with 0.5% tracking error closely mimics the index, with return differences staying within 0.5% in most periods. An actively managed large-cap fund with 8% tracking error makes significantly different holdings and timing decisions than its S&P 500 benchmark.
Students often confuse tracking error with alpha. Tracking error measures the consistency of return differences (volatility of excess returns), while alpha measures the average excess return itself. Also, lower tracking error is not always better: active managers intentionally seek higher tracking error to generate alpha.
How This Is Tested
- Distinguishing between appropriate tracking error levels for passive vs. active strategies
- Interpreting what low tracking error indicates about portfolio management style
- Understanding that tracking error measures consistency of excess returns, not the excess return itself
- Recognizing how index funds minimize tracking error through full replication or sampling
- Comparing tracking error to alpha and R-squared in performance evaluation
Calculation Example
Tracking Error = Standard Deviation of (Portfolio Return - Benchmark Return) × √12 - Calculate excess returns for each period (already given)
- Calculate mean excess return: (0.3 - 0.2 + 0.4 - 0.1 + 0.2 - 0.3 + 0.1 - 0.2 + 0.5 - 0.1 + 0.2 - 0.3) / 12 = 0.042%
- Calculate variance of excess returns around the mean
- Take square root to get monthly standard deviation: ~0.25%
- Annualize by multiplying by √12: 0.25% × 3.46 = 0.87%
Example Exam Questions
Test your understanding with these practice questions. Select an answer to see the explanation.
Marcus, a portfolio manager for a pension fund, oversees an S&P 500 index fund designed to replicate market performance with minimal costs. Over the past year, the fund has a tracking error of 0.40%, an expense ratio of 0.05%, and has closely matched the S&P 500 returns. The pension board is evaluating whether Marcus is meeting the fund's objective. Which assessment is most accurate?
B is correct. For a passive index fund designed to replicate the S&P 500, a tracking error of 0.40% is excellent and confirms Marcus is successfully minimizing return deviations from the benchmark. Passive index funds typically target tracking errors of 1-2%, with the best funds achieving under 1%. This low tracking error, combined with the 0.05% expense ratio, demonstrates efficient passive management.
A is incorrect because tracking error measures consistency of deviations, not underperformance. Some tracking error is inevitable due to transaction costs, cash drag, and rebalancing. C is incorrect because increasing tracking error would defeat the purpose of a passive index fund, which aims to match (not beat) the benchmark. D is incorrect because low tracking error indicates lower deviation risk, not excessive risk.
The Series 65 exam tests your ability to evaluate whether tracking error levels are appropriate for different management styles. Understanding that passive index funds should have low tracking error (under 1%) while active funds intentionally have higher tracking error is critical for assessing fund performance and alignment with investment objectives.
What does tracking error measure in portfolio performance analysis?
B is correct. Tracking error is defined as the standard deviation of the difference between a portfolio's returns and its benchmark's returns. It measures the consistency or volatility of excess returns, indicating how closely a fund follows its benchmark. Higher tracking error means more variable return differences.
A describes alpha, which measures the average excess return (not the volatility of excess returns). C describes R-squared, which measures the percentage of portfolio movements explained by the benchmark. D describes standard deviation of the portfolio itself, which measures total risk rather than deviation from a benchmark.
The Series 65 exam frequently tests your ability to distinguish between different performance metrics. Understanding that tracking error specifically measures the consistency (standard deviation) of return differences, not the average difference itself, is essential for accurate portfolio evaluation.
Master Investment Vehicles Concepts
CertFuel's spaced repetition system helps you retain key terms like Tracking Error and 500+ other exam concepts. Start practicing for free.
Access Free BetaAn equity mutual fund benchmarked against the Russell 2000 Small-Cap Index has a tracking error of 12%. What does this tracking error level most likely indicate about the fund's management approach?
C is correct. A tracking error of 12% is very high and indicates active management with substantial deviations from the benchmark. The manager is making significantly different security selections, sector weightings, or timing decisions compared to the Russell 2000 Index. Typical ranges: Passive index funds (1-2%), Enhanced index funds (2-4%), Active funds (4-7% or higher).
A is incorrect because passive index funds have very low tracking error (1-2%). B is possible but less likely than C; while benchmark mismatch can increase tracking error, 12% more commonly indicates intentional active management rather than poor benchmark selection. D is incorrect because 12% tracking error far exceeds the normal range for index funds, which should be 1-2%.
The Series 65 exam tests your ability to interpret tracking error values in context. Recognizing that tracking error levels reveal management style (passive vs. active) helps you evaluate whether a fund is delivering what it promises and whether fees are justified.
All of the following statements about tracking error are accurate EXCEPT
C is correct (the EXCEPT answer). Tracking error does NOT represent the average outperformance. That describes alpha. Tracking error measures the volatility or consistency of return differences (standard deviation of excess returns), not the average difference itself. A portfolio can have high tracking error with zero average excess return if its returns swing widely above and below the benchmark.
A is accurate: tracking error is the standard deviation of (portfolio return - benchmark return). B is accurate: lower tracking error means return differences are more consistent and predictable. D is accurate: passive index funds minimize tracking error (target 1-2%) to replicate benchmarks, while active managers intentionally have higher tracking error (4-7% or higher) because they deviate from benchmarks to generate alpha.
The Series 65 exam tests your ability to distinguish tracking error from alpha. Understanding that tracking error measures consistency (volatility) of excess returns while alpha measures the average excess return is critical for comprehensive performance evaluation.
Fund A is marketed as a passively managed S&P 500 index fund with a 0.65% tracking error and 0.09% expense ratio. Fund B is an actively managed large-cap fund with a 7.5% tracking error and 1.15% expense ratio. Both are benchmarked to the S&P 500. Which of the following statements are accurate?
1. Fund A's tracking error indicates it closely follows the S&P 500
2. Fund B's higher tracking error suggests it makes significantly different investment decisions than the benchmark
3. Fund A should have higher tracking error than Fund B to justify its passive strategy
4. Fund B's tracking error level is appropriate for an active management approach
C is correct. Statements 1, 2, and 4 are accurate.
Statement 1 is TRUE: Fund A's 0.65% tracking error is low and appropriate for a passive index fund, indicating it closely replicates the S&P 500 with minimal deviation. Index funds typically have tracking errors of 1-2%.
Statement 2 is TRUE: Fund B's 7.5% tracking error indicates the manager makes substantially different security selections, sector weightings, or timing decisions compared to the S&P 500 benchmark. This high tracking error is characteristic of active management.
Statement 3 is FALSE: This is backwards. Passive funds should have LOWER tracking error than active funds, not higher. Fund A correctly has much lower tracking error (0.65% vs. 7.5%) because it aims to replicate the benchmark, while Fund B intentionally deviates to pursue alpha.
Statement 4 is TRUE: A tracking error of 7.5% is within the normal range for actively managed equity funds (typically 4-7% or higher), indicating Fund B is pursuing active strategies with meaningful benchmark deviations.
The Series 65 exam tests your understanding of appropriate tracking error levels for different management styles. Recognizing that passive funds should minimize tracking error while active funds intentionally accept higher tracking error is essential for evaluating whether funds align with their stated strategies and fee structures.
💡 Memory Aid
Think of tracking error as measuring how tightly a dog follows its owner on a leash. Low tracking error (0.5-2%) = short leash (passive index fund stays close to benchmark). High tracking error (5%+) = long leash (active manager wanders far from benchmark). Key: Tracking error measures the consistency of wandering (standard deviation), not the average distance. Alpha measures the average distance.
Related Concepts
This term is part of this cluster: