Private Placement
Private Placement
An offering of unregistered securities to a limited group of investors that is exempt from SEC registration requirements, primarily conducted under Regulation D. Most commonly structured as Rule 506(b) offerings (no general solicitation, up to 35 sophisticated investors plus unlimited accredited investors) or Rule 506(c) offerings (general solicitation permitted, only verified accredited investors). Securities sold are restricted and subject to resale limitations.
A technology startup raises $25 million through a private placement under Rule 506(b) by selling equity to 15 venture capital firms (accredited investors) and 10 sophisticated angel investors without any public advertising. The company files Form D with the SEC and provides each investor with a private placement memorandum detailing risks and financial projections.
Private placements are exempt from registration requirements but NOT exempt from anti-fraud provisions - issuers must still provide accurate disclosures and cannot make false statements. Additionally, the exemption from registration does not mean the securities can be freely resold; they are restricted securities subject to holding periods and Rule 144 resale limitations.
How This Is Tested
- Distinguishing between registered public offerings and unregistered private placements based on Regulation D exemptions
- Identifying which investors qualify to participate in private placements (accredited vs. sophisticated investors)
- Understanding resale restrictions on privately placed securities and Rule 144 requirements
- Recognizing the difference between registration exemption and fraud exemption
- Determining when general solicitation is permitted (Rule 506(c) only) versus prohibited (Rule 506(b))
Regulatory Limits
| Description | Limit | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Rule 506(b) - Maximum non-accredited investors | 35 sophisticated (but non-accredited) investors | Plus unlimited accredited investors; no general solicitation or advertising permitted |
| Rule 506(c) - Investor requirements | Only accredited investors (must be verified) | General solicitation and advertising permitted; unlimited number of investors |
| Rule 504 - Small offering exemption | $10 million maximum in 12-month period | Fewer investor restrictions; may allow general solicitation in some cases |
| Form D filing requirement | Within 15 days of first sale | Required for all Regulation D offerings; filed electronically with SEC |
| Typical holding period for restricted securities | Minimum 6 months (often 12 months) | Before resale under Rule 144; securities bear restrictive legend |
| Accredited investor income threshold (individual) | $200,000+ annually (past 2 years) | Or $300,000+ joint income; must expect same level in current year |
| Accredited investor net worth threshold | $1,000,000+ (excluding primary residence) | Alternative qualification to income threshold |
Example Exam Questions
Test your understanding with these practice questions. Select an answer to see the explanation.
David, an investment adviser, has a client named Patricia who owns a successful medical practice and earns $280,000 annually. Patricia has $850,000 in investable assets and a home worth $1.2 million with a $400,000 mortgage. A private equity fund is offering investment opportunities through a private placement memorandum and requires all investors to be accredited. The fund promoter is advertising the opportunity on LinkedIn and requiring income verification. Can David recommend this investment to Patricia?
A is correct. Patricia qualifies as an accredited investor based on her income of $280,000, which exceeds the $200,000 individual income threshold (or $300,000 joint). She has earned this amount with reasonable expectation of the same in the current year, meeting the income test. The fact that the offering uses LinkedIn advertising indicates this is a Rule 506(c) offering (which permits general solicitation), requiring all investors to be verified accredited investors, which Patricia is.
B is incorrect in its calculation: Patricia's net worth for accredited investor purposes must exclude the primary residence entirely. Her qualifying net worth is $850,000 (investable assets only), which is below the $1 million threshold. The home value ($1.2M) and mortgage ($400K) are both excluded. C is incorrect because Patricia does qualify based on the income test - accredited investor status requires meeting either income OR net worth, not both. D is incorrect because the LinkedIn advertising indicates this is a Rule 506(c) offering, not 506(b), and Patricia qualifies as an accredited investor regardless.
The Series 65 exam tests your ability to determine client eligibility for private placements by evaluating accredited investor status using multiple qualification paths. Understanding that income OR net worth (not both) is required, and correctly calculating net worth by excluding primary residence, is essential for making appropriate suitability recommendations and ensuring regulatory compliance.
Which of the following accurately describes the primary difference between a private placement and a registered public offering?
A is correct. The fundamental distinction is that private placements conducted under Regulation D exemptions (primarily Rule 506(b) and 506(c)) are exempt from SEC registration requirements, while public offerings must register with the SEC by filing registration statements (typically Form S-1) and providing prospectuses to investors.
B is incorrect and represents a critical misconception: private placements are NOT exempt from anti-fraud provisions. Securities laws' anti-fraud rules apply to ALL securities transactions, whether registered or exempt. Issuers of private placements must still provide accurate, complete information and cannot make false or misleading statements. C is incorrect because private placements can be offered to accredited individual investors and sophisticated investors, not just institutions. D is backwards: private placement securities ARE restricted securities with resale limitations (typically 6-12 month holding periods and Rule 144 requirements), while registered public offerings generally allow immediate resale in the secondary market.
The Series 65 exam frequently tests the distinction between registration exemption and fraud exemption to ensure candidates understand that private placement participants still receive anti-fraud protections. This concept is critical because many investors mistakenly believe that unregistered securities lack regulatory protections, when in fact fraud liability applies regardless of registration status.
Master Laws & Regulations Concepts
CertFuel's spaced repetition system helps you retain key terms like Private Placement and 500+ other exam concepts. Start practicing for free.
Access Free BetaA real estate development company conducts a private placement under Rule 506(b), raising capital from investors between January 15, 2026 and March 30, 2026, with the first sale occurring on January 15. The company accepts investments from 12 accredited investors, 28 sophisticated but non-accredited investors, and 8 additional investors who are neither accredited nor sophisticated. By what date must the company file Form D with the SEC, and is the offering compliant with Rule 506(b) investor limits?
D is correct. Form D must be filed within 15 days of the FIRST sale. Calculate: January 15 (first sale) + 15 days = January 30, 2026 is the deadline. However, the offering VIOLATES Rule 506(b) requirements. Rule 506(b) permits unlimited accredited investors plus up to 35 NON-accredited investors, but those non-accredited investors must be "sophisticated" (possessing sufficient knowledge and experience in financial matters to evaluate the investment). The 28 sophisticated investors are acceptable, but the 8 investors who are neither accredited nor sophisticated cannot participate in a 506(b) offering. Only sophisticated non-accredited investors are allowed.
A incorrectly states the offering is compliant when it violates sophistication requirements. B has the correct filing date but incorrect reasoning - the limit is 35 sophisticated non-accredited investors, and the company has only 28 sophisticated investors (which is fine), but the problem is the 8 non-sophisticated investors. C has the wrong Form D filing date (should be 15 days from first sale, not closing date). The key violation in this offering is accepting non-sophisticated investors in a Rule 506(b) offering, which is prohibited regardless of the total count.
The Series 65 exam tests detailed knowledge of Rule 506(b) requirements, particularly the distinction between accredited investors (based on financial thresholds) and sophisticated investors (based on knowledge/experience). Understanding that Rule 506(b) requires non-accredited investors to be sophisticated is essential for compliance, as accepting non-sophisticated investors can destroy the registration exemption and expose the issuer to rescission liability.
All of the following statements about private placement offerings are accurate EXCEPT
C is correct (the EXCEPT answer). This statement is FALSE and represents a dangerous misconception. While private placements are exempt from SEC registration requirements under Regulation D, they are absolutely NOT exempt from anti-fraud provisions. Federal securities laws' anti-fraud rules (including Securities Act Section 17(a), Exchange Act Section 10(b), and Rule 10b-5) apply to ALL securities transactions, whether registered or unregistered. Issuers of private placements must provide accurate, truthful information and can face civil and criminal penalties for fraudulent statements or omissions.
A is accurate: Form D is an informational filing (not registration) required within 15 days of the first sale of securities in a Regulation D offering, filed electronically through the SEC's EDGAR system. B is accurate: Securities sold in private placements are "restricted securities" bearing a restrictive legend and subject to holding periods (typically 6-12 months) and Rule 144 volume limitations and conditions before resale. D is accurate: The JOBS Act created Rule 506(c) in 2013 specifically to permit general solicitation and advertising in private placements, provided all purchasers are accredited investors and the issuer takes reasonable steps to verify accredited status.
The Series 65 exam emphasizes that registration exemptions do NOT equal fraud exemptions to protect investors and ensure advisers understand their legal obligations. This distinction is one of the most critical concepts in securities law - the anti-fraud provisions of federal securities laws apply universally to all transactions. Candidates who believe private placements lack anti-fraud protections demonstrate a fundamental misunderstanding that the exam specifically targets.
An investment adviser is reviewing a private placement opportunity for potential client recommendations. The offering is conducted under Regulation D Rule 506(c), advertised through online platforms, and requires $100,000 minimum investment. The issuer provides a private placement memorandum and requires investors to provide tax returns and W-2 forms. Which of the following statements about this offering are accurate?
1. The offering can use general solicitation and advertising because it is structured under Rule 506(c)
2. Only accredited investors can participate in this offering
3. The issuer must verify accredited investor status through reasonable steps like reviewing financial documents
4. The offering is exempt from state securities registration in all 50 states
B is correct. Statements 1, 2, and 3 are accurate for Rule 506(c) offerings.
Statement 1 is TRUE: Rule 506(c), created by the JOBS Act in 2013, specifically permits general solicitation and advertising (including websites, social media, and online platforms) for private placements, which was previously prohibited under traditional Rule 506(b) offerings. This is the key feature distinguishing 506(c) from 506(b).
Statement 2 is TRUE: Rule 506(c) offerings can only sell securities to accredited investors - no sophisticated but non-accredited investors are permitted. This is the trade-off for allowing general solicitation: stricter investor qualifications. Rule 506(b) allows up to 35 sophisticated investors, but 506(c) does not.
Statement 3 is TRUE: When using general solicitation under Rule 506(c), issuers must take "reasonable steps" to verify that purchasers are accredited investors. Acceptable verification methods include reviewing IRS forms (W-2s, 1099s, tax returns), obtaining third-party verification letters from CPAs or attorneys, or reviewing bank/brokerage statements. The described practice of requiring tax returns and W-2s satisfies this verification requirement.
Statement 4 is FALSE: While Rule 506 offerings (both 506(b) and 506(c)) are "covered securities" under the National Securities Markets Improvement Act, meaning they are exempt from state registration requirements, states still retain jurisdiction over notice filings and fees. Issuers typically must file notice (often Form D) and pay fees in states where they offer or sell securities. Additionally, states retain anti-fraud enforcement authority over all securities offerings.
The Series 65 exam tests comprehensive understanding of Rule 506(c) mechanics, particularly the relationship between general solicitation (permitted), investor restrictions (accredited only), and verification requirements (must verify accredited status). Understanding these interconnected rules is essential for advisers who evaluate private placement opportunities for clients and must ensure both suitability and regulatory compliance.
💡 Memory Aid
Think of private placements like an exclusive VIP club: You need a membership pass (accredited/sophisticated investor status), the club follows special rules (Regulation D exemption), and once you're in, you can't transfer your membership to others (restricted securities). Remember: Private = VIP-Only with No Transfers.
Related Concepts
This term is part of these clusters:
More in Regulatory Bodies
Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC)
The primary federal regulator of securities markets, investment advisers, and se...
North American Securities Administrators Association (NASAA)
The association of state securities regulators that develops model rules like th...
Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA)
A self-regulatory organization (SRO) that regulates broker-dealers and their reg...
Accredited Investor
An investor who meets specific income or net worth thresholds, qualifying them t...
Estate Planning
The process of arranging wealth transfer strategies to minimize taxes and ensure...
529 Plan
A tax-advantaged education savings account (Section 529 Qualified Tuition Progra...
Where This Appears on the Exam
This term is tested in the following Series 65 exam topics:
Regulation of Securities and Issuers
Practice questions on securities registration, exempt securities, and exempt transactions....
Practice Questions →Client Profile and Data Gathering
Practice questions on risk tolerance, investment objectives, time horizon, and suitability analysis....
Practice Questions →Type of Client
Series 65 questions on individual vs institutional clients, business entities, and trusts....
Practice Questions →