Blue Sky Laws
Blue Sky Laws
State securities laws designed to protect investors from fraudulent securities sales and schemes. Originated in Kansas (1911) to prevent promoters from "selling the blue sky" with worthless offerings. Regulate securities and adviser registration within state borders, require securities offerings to register unless exempt or federal-covered, and grant state administrators broad anti-fraud authority that survives even after federal preemption.
Under blue sky laws, a company planning an intrastate stock offering solely within Texas must register the offering with the Texas State Securities Board even if the offering is exempt from SEC registration. The state has authority to review the offering, require disclosure documents, and deny registration if it finds the terms unfair to investors.
Blue sky laws were NOT eliminated by federal securities laws. The National Securities Markets Improvement Act (NSMIA) of 1996 preempted state registration of federal-covered securities, but states retained anti-fraud authority and still regulate smaller advisers, broker-dealers, and non-federal-covered securities. Blue sky laws complement (not duplicate) SEC regulations through dual jurisdiction.
How This Is Tested
- Understanding the origin and purpose of blue sky laws as state investor protection measures
- Distinguishing between state authority (blue sky laws) and federal authority (SEC regulations)
- Recognizing that NSMIA preempted state registration for federal-covered securities but preserved anti-fraud enforcement
- Identifying when state registration is required for securities offerings and investment advisers
- Understanding state administrator powers under blue sky laws including investigation, denial, and cease-and-desist authority
Regulatory Limits
| Description | Limit | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Historical origin | Kansas 1911 | First state to enact comprehensive securities regulation law |
| State investment adviser registration threshold | Less than $100 million AUM | Advisers below this level register under state blue sky laws, not SEC |
| NSMIA federal preemption | 1996 | Federal law preempted state registration of federal-covered securities but preserved state anti-fraud authority |
| State anti-fraud authority | Unlimited jurisdiction | States retain full authority to investigate and prosecute securities fraud regardless of federal registration status |
Example Exam Questions
Test your understanding with these practice questions. Select an answer to see the explanation.
Texas Energy Solutions plans to raise $3 million by selling common stock exclusively to Texas residents for developing local oil wells. The offering qualifies for the federal intrastate offering exemption under Rule 147, so SEC registration is not required. The company asks if state registration is necessary. Which recommendation is most accurate?
B is correct. Federal exemptions from SEC registration (like the Rule 147 intrastate exemption) do NOT automatically exempt offerings from state blue sky law registration. Texas Energy Solutions must still register the offering with the Texas State Securities Board under Texas blue sky laws unless a specific state exemption applies. States retain authority to regulate securities offerings within their borders.
A is incorrect because federal and state securities laws operate independently. Qualifying for a federal exemption doesn't eliminate state registration requirements. C is incorrect because securities regulation is a dual federal-state system. The SEC doesn't have exclusive jurisdiction; states regulate through blue sky laws. D is incorrect because NSMIA preempted state registration only for federal-covered securities (like NYSE-listed stocks and SEC-registered investment company securities), not for intrastate offerings that are exempt from federal registration.
The Series 65 exam tests your understanding that federal exemptions do not automatically provide state exemptions. Recognizing the dual regulatory framework where both SEC and state requirements can apply simultaneously is critical for advising clients on securities offerings and avoiding inadvertent violations of state blue sky laws.
The term "blue sky laws" originated in the early 1900s to describe state securities laws. Which state enacted the first comprehensive blue sky law in 1911?
C is correct. Kansas enacted the first comprehensive state securities law in 1911, establishing the model for blue sky laws nationwide. The term "blue sky" came from the concern that fraudulent promoters were selling securities with no more basis than "so many feet of blue sky."
A (New York) enacted securities laws early but was not the first state with comprehensive regulation. B (California) has significant securities regulation but was not the 1911 originator. D (Delaware) is known for corporate law (corporate charters) rather than being the pioneer in securities regulation.
The Series 65 exam tests knowledge of blue sky law origins to establish the historical foundation of state securities regulation. Understanding that state regulation preceded federal regulation (Securities Act of 1933) by more than 20 years demonstrates the deep roots of state authority in investor protection.
Master Laws & Regulations Concepts
CertFuel's spaced repetition system helps you retain key terms like Blue Sky Laws and 500+ other exam concepts. Start practicing for free.
Access Free BetaMidwest Advisory Group is SEC-registered with $200 million AUM and has offices in Illinois and Missouri. The firm provides advisory services to 40 individual clients in Iowa but has no Iowa office. Which statement about blue sky law obligations is most accurate?
B is correct. SEC-registered advisers (federal-covered advisers) are exempt from state registration requirements but must file notice filings in states where they have offices or meet client thresholds. State anti-fraud authority was specifically preserved by NSMIA. Midwest must file notice in Illinois and Missouri (offices) and Iowa (likely exceeds client threshold with 40 clients), and all three states retain authority to investigate and prosecute fraud.
A is incorrect because while SEC registration preempts state registration requirements, it does NOT exempt advisers from notice filing or state anti-fraud enforcement. States explicitly retained anti-fraud jurisdiction under NSMIA. C is incorrect because federal-covered advisers don't register under state blue sky laws; they file notice filings, which are simpler administrative filings. D is incorrect because FINRA regulates broker-dealers, not investment advisers, and NSMIA didn't eliminate state jurisdiction. it redefined it to notice filing plus anti-fraud authority.
The Series 65 exam extensively tests the post-NSMIA framework where federal-covered advisers have limited state obligations (notice filing) but states retain anti-fraud enforcement power. Understanding this nuanced dual jurisdiction prevents overestimating federal preemption and ensures compliance with state blue sky law anti-fraud provisions.
All of the following are accurate about blue sky laws EXCEPT
C is correct (the EXCEPT answer). Blue sky laws were NOT eliminated by NSMIA. While NSMIA preempted state registration requirements for federal-covered securities (like NYSE-listed stocks and SEC-registered funds), states retained significant authority including anti-fraud enforcement, registration of non-federal-covered securities, and regulation of smaller investment advisers and broker-dealers. Blue sky laws continue to operate alongside federal securities laws.
A is accurate: State administrators have broad authority under blue sky laws to deny, suspend, or revoke securities registrations if they find offerings unfair, fraudulent, or contrary to public interest. B is accurate: Investment advisers managing less than $100 million AUM register under state blue sky laws (typically the Uniform Securities Act) rather than with the SEC. D is accurate: The term 'blue sky laws' emerged from efforts to stop promoters from selling worthless securities, preventing them from 'selling the blue sky' to unsuspecting investors.
The Series 65 exam tests whether candidates understand that state securities regulation survived federal preemption. The common misconception that NSMIA eliminated state authority can lead to serious compliance violations when advisers fail to meet state notice filing, anti-fraud, or registration requirements under applicable blue sky laws.
Under state blue sky laws, a state securities administrator has been investigating a potential securities fraud involving a local investment adviser. Which of the following powers does the administrator have under typical blue sky law provisions?
1. Authority to issue subpoenas for documents and testimony
2. Power to issue cease and desist orders without prior hearing in emergency situations
3. Authority to deny or revoke investment adviser registration
4. Jurisdiction to prosecute criminal violations in state court
D is correct. All four statements are accurate.
Statement 1 is TRUE: State administrators have subpoena power under blue sky laws to compel production of documents, records, and testimony during investigations. This is a core enforcement tool.
Statement 2 is TRUE: In emergency situations where immediate action is needed to protect investors, administrators can issue summary cease and desist orders without prior hearing. Due process occurs through post-order hearings where the respondent can challenge the order.
Statement 3 is TRUE: State administrators have authority to deny initial registration applications, suspend existing registrations, or permanently revoke registrations of investment advisers, broker-dealers, and securities professionals who violate blue sky laws.
Statement 4 is TRUE: State administrators can refer criminal violations to state prosecutors for criminal charges in state court. Blue sky laws typically include both civil and criminal penalties, with criminal prosecution for willful violations.
The Series 65 exam tests comprehensive knowledge of state administrator enforcement powers. Understanding the breadth of blue sky law authority (administrative, civil, and criminal) is critical for recognizing the serious consequences of violations and advising clients on state compliance obligations beyond just registration requirements.
💡 Memory Aid
Picture Kansas 1911: A farmer looking up at the blue sky while a smooth-talking promoter tries to sell him shares in "sky property" (worthless securities). Blue sky laws stop con artists from "selling the blue sky" with nothing behind it. Remember: State laws came FIRST (1911), federal SEC laws came later (1933). States still enforce anti-fraud, even after NSMIA.
Related Concepts
This term is part of this cluster:
More in Regulatory Bodies
Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC)
The primary federal regulator of securities markets, investment advisers, and se...
North American Securities Administrators Association (NASAA)
The association of state securities regulators that develops model rules like th...
Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA)
A self-regulatory organization (SRO) that regulates broker-dealers and their reg...
Where This Appears on the Exam
This term is tested in the following Series 65 exam topics:
Regulation of Investment Advisers
Series 65 questions on IA registration, SEC vs state jurisdiction, and federal covered advisers....
Practice Questions →Regulation of Securities and Issuers
Practice questions on securities registration, exempt securities, and exempt transactions....
Practice Questions →